Saturday, 2 January 2016

Evaluating the Rough Cut

1a) The order of the shots does make sense.
b) The order is the same as we had planned it. However, whilst editing we were supposed to have a split screen so you can see the contrast between the two characters social background better.

2) The quality of the camera work is pretty poor. The camera was shaky and we should have used a fig rig to record the scenes where the characters are walking. The camera was also not straight and the shots were diagonal and slanted. As we did use the zoom on the camera, sometimes the shots would get slightly blurred and out of focus.

3) We did try to use a variety of shots. I don't think we used them effectively though. The shots didn't fit as seamlessly as I would have hoped. We used: over the shoulder; mid-shot; wide-shot and close-ups.

4) We used the natural daylight. We didn't use the lighting to show different moods.

5) The location was Camden Town. The setting was modern and is set in the 21st century. We didn't get to use our props because we ran out of time. Our costumes were based on stereotypes. For example, the richer character was dressed in heels and a dress. The other character was dressed in all black and was trainers.



No comments:

Post a Comment